MEMBER SIGN IN
Don't have an account? Click Here
BCS Rankings Released
Release: 10/24/2000
Send Mail Print RSS
Related Links

Oct. 24, 2000

The BCS, chaired this season by ACC commissioner John Swofford, was created two years ago to come up with a national title game without instituting a playoff. After the top two teams are decided, the remaining BCS games -- the Rose, Sugar and Fiesta bowls -- select from the remaining pool of qualified teams.

Champions of six conferences -- the ACC, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-10 and SEC -- qualify for a BCS game, and two at-large teams are selected to fill out the field.

In each of the first two seasons of the BCS standings, the teams that played for the title also were ranked 1-2 in the polls. Tennessee beat Florida State in the 1999 Fiesta Bowl for the '98 title, and Florida State beat Virginia Tech in the 2000 Sugar Bowl for the '99 championship.

Complete Standings in PDF Format
Download Free Acrobat Reader

BCS RANKINGS
(as of 10/23/00)

Rank Team Poll
Avg.
Computer
Avg.
Schedule
Rank
Losses TOTAL
1. Nebraska 1.0 1.57 1.04 0 3.61
2. Oklahoma 3.0 1.71 0.72 0 5.43
3. Virginia Tech 2.0 4.14 0.52 0 6.66
4. Miami (Fla.) 4.5 4.14 0.12 1 9.76
5. Florida State 6.0 4.14 1.00 1 12.14
6. Florida 7.5 6.86 0.84 1 16.20
7. Clemson 4.5 7.86 3.88 0 16.24
8. Oregon 8.5 8.00 0.60 1 18.10
9. Washington 9.0 9.57 0.32 1 19.89
10. Kansas State 9.0 8.71 3.04 1 21.75
11. Ohio State 12.5 10.14 0.92 1 24.56
12. Georgia 12.5 14.00 1.96 1 29.46
13. TCU 11.0 16.29 4.36 0 31.65
14. Southern Miss 14.0 15.71 3.16 1 33.87
15. Purdue 16.0 15.57 1.12 2 34.69
EXPLANATION
Poll Average: Average of USA Today/ESPN Coaches and AP Media Polls. Others receiving votes calculated in order received.
Computer Average: Average of Richard Billingsley, Dunkel Index, Kenneth Massey, New York Times, David Rothman, Jeff Sagarin's USA Today, Matthews/Scripps-Howard, and the Anderson & Hester/Seattle Times rankings. The computer component will be determined by averaging the seven highest computer rankings. The lowest computer ranking will be disregarded.
Schedule Rank: Rank of schedule strength compared to other Division I-A teams of actual games played divided by 25. This component is calculated by determining the cumulative won/loss records of the team's opponent (66 2/3 percent) and the cumulative won/loss records of the team's opponents' opponents (33 1/3 percent).
Losses: One point for each loss during the season.
Notes: BCS Standings each week will list the top 15 teams.
For more: Visit www.footballfoundation.com, the official website of the National Football Foundation.
Washington Football
RUN WITH US
advertisement
Spring Preview 14
Advertisement
Pac-12 Networks